Even a year ago, weeks could go by between major Disclosure events. Now there are multiple signals per week. Are they trying to tell us something? Does a bear sit in the woods?
BUILDING UP TO SOMETHING
In the last few months, things have gotten really wonderful for the Disclosure crowd — to the point where I don’t even have enough time to try to track and write about all of it, while juggling my other responsibilities. This includes:
Multiple, blatant UFO sightings, some of which shut down entire airports;
Major press conferences with multiple eyewitnesses announcing that nuclear missile installations have been powered down by ‘flying saucers’ which otherwise were not aggressive, and may in fact have our best interests in mind;
A huge number of “life is highly abundant in the universe” scientific articles;
This is definitely not ‘smoke and mirrors.’ This is a clear, deliberate and concerted effort. And it’s building up to something.
“THE EVENT”
Among all of these various elements, the NBC television show “The Event” stands out as particularly provocative. Here you have a television show about a black President — who looks and sounds just like Obama — stumbling into the truth of human ETs soon after he takes office.
In this story, some 97 human-looking ETs crashed in a spaceship in Alaska in the 1940s, and were held hostage at ‘Camp Inostranka’ ever since. The president learns this truth, meets the people and plans an open Disclosure in a live national press conference.
Right before he discloses these secrets to humanity, he suffers a 9/11-style attack by a hijacked passenger airliner. The plane then pops through a wormhole right before it hits the ground and ends up in a remote desert, apparently by ET influence.
All the passengers onboard the plane initially survive, but they then end up dying — or so we think. The analysis of the bodies at the crash site shows that they appeared to have been running from something — perhaps a beam weapon.
The government plans on ‘distressing’ the bodies to make it look like they all died in a fiery crash, which they intend to fabricate for a cover-up.
THE WEIRD VIRUS
Then, in very disturbing zombie-like fashion, the bodies all end up re-animating in a secret military bunker. At first they seem to be fine, but then they all start hemorrhaging blood from their noses and mouths.
We learn that they have a weird virus, which they were given by the ET opposition leader — and they will be dead within 24 hours unless the President frees all the ET detainees at Inostranka, in exchange for the vaccine.
Fighting for the lives of the survivors, the president wrestles with the opposition leader, who claims he will use this same weapon on whole cities of Americans if the 97 detainees are not freed.
The president ends up getting the antidote by threatening to execute all of the ETs if the opposition leader does not produce the serum first.
THE MEDIUM IS THE MESSAGE
This Monday night’s show effectively picks up at this point in the storyline — and I’m leaving quite a bit out of it here. Though it is a bit clumsy at certain points, and I don’t find the portrayal of the president and his entourage particularly believable, the overall execution is quite good.
There does appear to be a lot of fear-mongering about human-looking ETs in this show, such as their apparent willingness to use terrorist tactics to get their way.
Nonetheless, it also seems clear that we are being given a message that they are not all bad people — only a small number of them.
Furthermore, the seemingly positive female leader of the ETs (who is obviously cast to look and sound very similar to the heroic female president in Battlestar Galactica) alludes to an upcoming ‘Event’ without elaboration at this point in the story.
WHAT’S IN A NAME?
In the title, the second “E” in “Event” is reversed. This highlights the ‘V’ in the middle — as in the previous show ‘V’, which was also about human-looking ETs. It also encourages us to pick out the word ‘EVE.’
Remember that this is all part of a Processed Release of Information (PRI) program, and the underlying body of information to be disclosed has been in place for thousands of years. I discuss this in my radio show with William Henry, linked below.
I feel it is safe to assume that in this TV series, “The Event” will involve a certain amount of cataclysmic activity on the Earth. It should also upgrade our DNA at the same time — leading to a new humanity.
A new Eve.
This would then allow the show to go in the direction of “Heroes” and other such programs where people begin developing ‘powers’.
If that’s really where this is going, then “The Event” may well be the most blatant, in-your-face, one-stop-shop Disclosure mechanism ever put out by the media — at least thus far.
Marketwatch’s David Weidner makes a stop on Mean Street to point out that amid all of Apple’s recently reported financial successes, there is a familiar dark side to all the good news. Photo: Reuters.
DURBAN, South Africa—Two weeks of meetings that often descended into meteorological minutiae culminated Friday evening in a last-ditch effort to salvage a global climate deal, pitting the U.S. against emerging powers China and India over whether to hold each other accountable for greenhouse-gas emissions.
Late into Friday in this humid port city, delegates from the world’s major economies met in closed conference rooms to pore over drafts of potential agreements. The outcome is critical for developing countries, particularly in Africa, where agrarian economies are particularly vulnerable to climate change and governments lack the funds to help people adapt.
In the corridors of the convention center, dozens of young activists from Greenpeace and other environmental organizations waved signs imploring delegates not to “kill Africa” and repeated chants demanding “climate justice now.”
“A lot of people are freaked out, they are petrified at what’s happening—and what’s not happening—here,” said Adam Greenberg, a 23-year-old recent graduate of Global College of Long Island University.
A pledge to work toward a deal binding them to limit emissions after 2020 was in doubt even after two major emerging countries, Brazil and South Africa, agreed to support a pact.
The European Union, long a champion of a legally binding international accord, was lobbying the U.S., India and China to accept such an arrangement. Under its road map, developed countries that have ratified the Kyoto Protocol would agree to extend the emissions cuts it dictates beyond their scheduled expiration at the end of next year. In the meantime, the U.S., China and India, major economies that aren’t subject to the Kyoto Protocol, would negotiate a binding emissions-reduction pact by 2015 that could begin after 2020.
China and India have said binding emission cuts would curb development that is lifting millions out of poverty, and punish them unfairly for the emissions industrial nations have produced over decades.
~or…how the heck did i end up here?…this is translated ~jude
Ministry of Railways in the end how the poor?
There have been rumors, the Ministry of Railways 800 billion to the state for help
Ministry of Railways has been exposed, 800 billion to the state for help to remove the difficulties, the article said that the current suspension of rail projects throughout the country 10,000 km mileage, to keep these items takes about trillion funds. Financial support from the Ministry of Railways had hoped 400 billion, while bonds 400 billion, but only 200 billion yuan to finalize the financing … … Although this article was quickly identified as rumor, but still caused a small fluctuation, the Ministry of Railways issued bonds after intensive behavior has also been interpreted as the performance of financial pressure. [More]
In fact, the Ministry of Railways nearly 2 trillion yuan of total liabilities
July 14, China Bond Information Network of the Ministry of Railways announced audited 2010 financial report. Data show that as of last year, total assets of 3.29 trillion yuan Ministry of Railways, an increase of 34.08%; Total liabilities 1.89 trillion yuan, up 45.14%; asset-liability ratio 57.44%, up 4.38 percentage points. Last year, after-tax profit 15 million yuan, down 99.45%, the cumulative loss of 77.2 billion yuan last year.
As a monopoly of the world’s largest railway system, the giant entity, in addition to long-term loss into a real quagmire, the Ministry of Railways revenue growth far exceeds the growth rate debt, however, a heavy debt burden, can not help worrying. [More]
In a monopoly position, the Ministry of Railways why not make money?
Ministry of Railways official said: loss due to rising raw material
According to “the first quarter of 2011, the Ministry of Railways key financial and operating data report”, the railway transport sector total revenue of 155.8 billion yuan, the total costs (tax included) to 159.56 billion yuan, the profit loss of 3.76 billion yuan. Loss for the first quarter of this year, the Ministry of Railways said to be due to diesel fuel, steel, parts, maintenance materials and other raw materials prices. In particular, diesel, compared to same period last year, nearly a thousand dollars per ton of diesel prices, alone, the railway transport enterprises increased in the first quarter of this year, the cost of 1.55 billion yuan.
CPPCC member, former CPC Central Committee Zheng Xinli, deputy director of the Policy Research believes that now is in a high-speed rail input stage, a few years the transport normal and will soon be profitable. ”Rail transport to the general account to calculate the long-term account.”
Civil Interpretation: The total railway investment is excessive loss of the main reason
In fact, the rail system due to excessive investment, leading to imbalances in the overall operation, and so the risk of debt facing the railway sector has long been an open secret. In 2010, the Ministry of Railways total revenues were 685.7 billion yuan, total operating profit of 65.555 billion yuan, however, “after-tax construction funds 61.339 billion yuan,” the words “before construction fund 65.354 billion yuan,” about two pen construction fund child removed 126.7 billion yuan.
Ministry of Railways in 2010 bank loan balance of approximately 1.3373 trillion yuan, the same year, the amount of debt service of up to 150.117 billion yuan. From the above data, the Ministry of Railways of the cash flow from operations and a considerable amount of debt service. If used for debt service, and left about 86 million. ”Basically, the rest of the money could not do something else.” At the same time, the Ministry of Railways financing costs are still rising … … [more]
But wait a minute, half-price tickets is really poor management and the dilemma it?
From the data, the business of the Ministry of Railways bleak indeed has his own difficulties, but the Ministry of Railways disabled concessionary fares really afford it?
According to statistics, currently 90 million people with disabilities across the country, adding the second car per person per year, each cost $ 200, then the half-year cost is about 10 billion, while the Ministry of Railways have a high-speed rail investment, billions , but mostly of income over expenditure, the Ministry of Railways to build high-speed rail a little time and then carefully, not only can enjoy the National Disabled hundred million years of half-price discount services, but also can reduce their body has been overwhelmed by the debt. Why not?[more]
In the final, or the fault of the monopoly
This railway sector “and the loss of monopoly” situation, is not surprising. ”Monopoly profits” is not the only characteristics of a monopoly, “inefficient monopoly” is its essence. The lack of competition, monopoly generally will not have much initiative to improve and enhance the operational level of the quality of power and pressure, therefore, the internal operation and management of loss costs that are often very large, and ultimately a “bloated, overstaffed” and other monopolies disease.
Needless to say, China’s railway sector is not only the monopoly of a common economic in nature, but also a high degree of unity between government and enterprises of administrative monopoly – Ministry of Railways is not only the only company within the industry, but also the administration of the industry regulator. And this high degree of integration between government and enterprises under the system of monopoly, the railway losses more inevitable. For example, investment in the railway business, both companies may lose market rationality and blind waste, but also may lose the government’s administrative rationality brought public injury. This respect, public opinion in recent years, the number of hot high-speed rail investment trillion debt, it can be said is a typical.
How to make the railway sector to rid itself of loss, the difficulties do not make money, how the final analysis it is still a “get rid of monopoly”, in particular, how get rid of the administrative monopoly of rectitude. Only by allowing the railway sector, “Chief administrative naturalization, corporate owned enterprises”, in order to promote market liberalization and competition in the railway, but also half-price tickets to persons with disabilities to apply this kind of thing is not so tangled. [More]
~no pictures of current chief of staff in China? They don’t need the TPP that have the China Silk Road~jude
November 13, 2011
A further step toward a U.S.-backed free trade bloc handed Asia-Pacific leaders a rare tangible achievement from their annual summit, but highlighted growing competition with China for influence in the fast rising region.
Asia’s increasingly vital role as a driver of global growth has added urgency to the campaign to remove barriers and bottlenecks that slow trade and business — the original mission of the 21-member Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum, whose 21 members join economies huge and tiny, rich and poor.
President Obama, flanked by leaders of eight other nations involved in negotiations on setting up the trading bloc, said he was optimistic the trade pact dubbed the Trans-Pacific Partnership could draft a legal framework by next year.
“It is an ambitious goal, but we are optimistic that we can get it done,” he said on the summit’s sidelines.
The so-called TPP is billed as a building block for eventually forging a free trade zone that encompasses all of Asia and the Pacific. It now includes only four smaller economies — Chile, New Zealand, Brunei and Singapore — but the U.S., Australia, Malaysia, Vietnam and Peru are negotiating to join, and Japan said it hopes to as well.
Eurozone leaders have brought their begging bowl to China, looking for help in boosting their bailout fund. So what does this say about the shift in the global balance of power?
In October 1911, China rose up in revolution. Four months later the last emperor had fallen and European moneymen were flocking to Beijing, eager to finance the bankrupt new republic.
In October 2011, another European moneyman headed for Beijing. But Klaus Regling, head of the European Financial Stability Facility, did not go there to lend to China. He was there to borrow, asking China to save Europe from economic disaster.
In just one century, China has gone from financial basketcase to the world’s banker, and Europe has made the same trip in the other direction. It is one of the biggest turnarounds in history. How did it happen? And, more to the point, what does it mean?
The turnaround is part of a much longer story.
“Start Quote
The average Briton or American earns 10 times as much as the average Chinese. But China is catching up”
Ian Morris
It begins around 1600, when China was the richest nation on earth and Europeans, anxious to trade with China, were building new kinds of ships. For millennia, the Atlantic Ocean had been a barrier cutting Europe off from the rest of the world, but Europe’s new ships effectively shrank the ocean, turning it into a commercial highway. By 1700, the resources of the Americas were feeding a European take-off.
In the run-up to the European Debt crisis, Greece racked up plenty of debt as a member of the Euro.
When it became clear that Greece was in big trouble, other Euro countries had to help or risk contagion.
Angela Merkel of Germany forced bondholders to take a 50% haircut while Sarkozy of France went to China for some relief.
Merkel was praised for her leadership in cobbling together a bailout for the Greeks but in a twist that put global markets in turmoil, Greek PM Papandreou announced a referendum to decide whether or not to take the deal.
Merkel and Sarkozy are sure to put pressure on Papandreou to take the deal immediately. If not, Greece might find itself out of the Euro.
BEIJING — The head of the eurozone bailout fund visits Beijing on Friday as debt-laden Europe tries to persuade China and other top emerging economies to come to its rescue.
Klaus Regling, chief executive of the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF), will be in the Chinese capital before travelling to Japan at the weekend, European Union delegations in Beijing and Tokyo have said.
Regling’s visit comes a day after European nations reached a last-ditch deal to tackle their festering debt crisis, which they hope will boost market confidence in struggling eurozone economies.
French President Nicolas Sarkozy announced at a summit in Brussels that eurozone leaders had agreed to leverage the 440-billion-euro EFSF, the continent’s bailout fund, to one trillion euros ($1.4 trillion).
Throughout the post 9/11 era, Al Qaeda and the “threat of Islamic terrorism” have played a central role in defining Washington’s diplomatic agenda, shaping its rhetoric at World summits as well as establishing the contours of US military doctrine.
The pre-emptive “defensive war” doctrine against Al Qaeda and its alleged “State Sponsors” constitutes the foundation of America’s post 9/11 National Security Strategy (NSS), first formulated in early 2002.
In the wake of 9/11, the Al Qaeda Legend became part of the mainstay of US foreign policy. Contained in the 2002 NSS is the notion of a “global jihadist network of terrorists” and “state sponsors of terrorism”. The response of the US administration is to launch “a war of global reach”, a “Global War on Terrorism” (GWOT):
“The war against terrorists of global reach is a global enterprise of uncertain duration. …America will act against such emerging threats before they are fully formed.
…Rogue states and terrorists do not seek to attack us using conventional means. They know such attacks would fail. Instead, they rely on acts of terror and, potentially, the use of weapons of mass destruction (…)
The targets of these attacks are our military forces and our civilian population, in direct violation of one of the principal norms of the law of warfare. As was demonstrated by the losses on September 11, 2001, mass civilian casualties is the specific objective of terrorists and these losses would be exponentially more severe if terrorists acquired and used weapons of mass destruction.
The United States has long maintained the option of preemptive actions to counter a sufficient threat to our national security. The greater the threat, the greater is the risk of inaction— and the more compelling the case for taking anticipatory action to defend ourselves, (…). To forestall or prevent such hostile acts by our adversaries, the United States will, if necessary, act preemptively.” (National Security Strategy, White House, 2002, http://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/nss.html
The underlying objective of the 2002 NSS was to present “pre-emptive military action” –meaning war as an act of “self-defense” against two categories of enemies, “Rogue States” and “Islamic terrorists”, both of which were said to possess “Weapons of Mass Destruction”. The “Rogue States” are also defined as “State sponsors” of terrorism.
The 2002 NSS as well as subsequent National Security documents identified a list of “Axis of Evil” countries which had been singled out for preemptive military intervention under the “Global War on Terrorism”. These included Iraq, Iran, Sudan, Syria, Libya, North Korea.
