Actually it began a long time ago. Secretively, the skirmishes began in plush back rooms, with just a few of the “Elite” of the world, plotting on how to take over and make the planet serve their purposes. Their motto? Serve or be served. They are the Powers That Be and they certainly don’t intend to serve us.
Now they’ve decided to include the rest of us in the game.
This all sounds very dramatic. It sounds like something from a really good spy flick or a supernatural battle movie, where good always wins in the end, no matter what the odds. You can almost picture the players…..the good looking hero and his beautiful sidekick, the scowling villains, heads surrounded eerily by the wafting smoke from their cigars. Film noir at it’s finest, a thrilling ride that is over in two hours and 10 minutes, with justice firmly reestablished.
This isn’t a movie, though. It’s not just life in the United States – this is the world over. The end-game of the PTB is near, and we must now all pick a side. The choices are defined. We are now pawns in the game, being moved around the big golden game board by the richest most powerful 1% of the world’s population. We are the toys of spoiled sociopathic children with armies.
You can’t opt out – participation is a requirement.
~comments under video currently *unavailable*~jude
Gage Canadian Dictionary 1983 Sec. 4 defines Capitalize adj. as “To take advantage of – To use to ones
own advantage.”Blacks Law Dictionary • Revised 4th Edition 1968, provides a more comprehensive definition as follows Capitis Diminutio (meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization) In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man’s status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications. Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John Doe) – The lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man’s family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation[pride] of a person who had been his own master, (suijuris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom.Law, 144.
By Neil Foster – The Sovereign Independent – Ireland
These days it seems difficult to comprehend for many ordinary people why the world seems steeped in chaos, both financial and militaristic.
It feels as if the world is turning on its head as people’s finances pour down the drain of bailouts to private banks at the behest of corrupt governments across the world and armies invade countries in far off lands for increasing dubious reasons which have nothing to do with terrorism or any other ‘ism’ label those in positions of power wish to abuse in the name of a ‘holy crusade’ or ‘just war’. And forget ‘democracy’, if we ever had anything remotely resembling ‘democracy’ it disappeared down the memory hole along with the assumption that we had free speech and a free society.
We’ve not been ‘free’ in any true sense of the word for many a year and it’s only getting worse as tyranny is being imposed through the same corrupt governments, in cahoots with the same criminal banking Mafioso, robbing us of any wealth we may have left in our depleted bank accounts.
So, who is ensuring our demise in light of the obvious crimes being perpetrated upon the ordinary people?
It’s a sad indictment of our society these days that the very people who should be protecting us, the public who pay their wages, are the very people complicit in bringing about the tyrannical system of governance which we have been forced into under the guise of ‘protecting us’ from terrorists from those countries our moronic, yet elected, powerbrokers have plunged us into without ever asking the public for their opinion, or permission, to undertake such a fruitless adventure in terms of any benefit to the people supplying the invading hordes or indeed the victims of such violent and unacceptable, in any human context, invasions of sovereign nations who have never harmed us at all.
The 112th Congress is in the process of another shove, another push in its effort to convert the rights of American citizens into a licensed privilege. Senate bill 176, entitled the ‘‘Common Sense Concealed Firearms Permit Act of 2011,” not only flies in the face of individual rights but stomps all over states powers as well.
In section two of the bill it looks to add a section to federal statutes titled as section “926D. Concealed firearms permits” in which federal law would enact a mandate that controls how state residents may obtain a concealed carry permit stating:
1.“Establish a process to issue permits to residents of the State to carry concealed firearms” and 2. Requires anyone seeking to carry concealed must “obtain a permit through the process established under paragraph (1).”
So, even states, like Vermont, Arizona, or any others seeking constitutional concealed carry (where no permit is required) would mandate that the state take on the process and cost of issuing permits to persons desiring to do so.
Much of this, I would have to speculate, is to try and stop the movement within many states that are doing away with concealed carry permits, called constitutional carry, and opting for laws that allow their citizens to carry as they see fit without permit. To do otherwise is a conversion of a right into a privilege – one does not have to ask permission to do something that is a right.
Just so everyone is on the same footing here, a privilege, by legal definition, is “A special legal right, exemption, or immunity granted to a person or class of persons, an exception to a duty.” In other words it gives permission to the person exercising the privilege the ability to do something that would otherwise be illegal without the permit (permission). Permit goes hand in hand with privilege as it means: “A certificate evidencing permission; a license <a gun permit>.”
Washington is owned by the private global banking cartel that owns Wall Street. International law does not apply to this criminal cartel. They stole trillions of dollars from the American people with help from corrupt politicians over a stretch of many decades, culminating in the government bailout in 2008, and they have not been held accountable.
These bandits and looters could care less if America crashes and burns. In fact, they want America to die because they want to institute a private world government upon its ruins.
This is true but the law being referred to (Employer Sanctions Law) was enacted in 2008. This is not about the more recent SB1070 but the point is still valid.
The State ofSonora is angry at the influx of Mexicans into Mexico. Nine state legislators from the Mexican State of Sonora traveled to Tucson to complain about Arizona’s new employer crackdown on illegals from Mexico. It seems that many Mexican illegals are returning to their hometowns and the officials in the Sonora state government are ticked off.
A delegation of nine state legislators from Sonora was in Tucson on Tuesday to state that Arizona’s new Employer Sanctions Law will have a devastating effect on the Mexican state. At a news conference, the legislators said that Sonora, – Arizona’s southern neighbor – made up of mostly small towns – cannot handle the demand for housing, jobs and schools that it will face as Mexican workers return to their hometowns from the USA without jobs or money.
Learn to spot disinformation and understand it, even defeat it. Read the rules at proparanoid.net/truth.htm. Hear them, here. Ask for free sample newsletter on PCT. Don’t know what PCT is? Then you are already a victim. Get the entire Alice in Amerikaland album FREE with any donation to the Free Will Society. proparanoid
After dutifully reporting even the smallest profits on their tax filings this year, a number – though no one knows exactly what that number is – of Philadelphia bloggers were dispatched letters informing them that they owe $300 for a [lifetime] privilege license [or $50 per year for an annual license], plus taxes on any profits they made.
Even if, as with Sean Barry, that profit is $11 over two years.[...]
Even though small-time bloggers aren’t exactly raking in the dough, the city requires privilege licenses for any business engaged in any “activity for profit,” says tax attorney Michael Mandale of Center City law firm Mandale Kaufmann. This applies “whether or not they earned a profit during the preceding year,” he adds.
So even if your blog collects a handful of hits a day, as long as there’s the potential for it to be lucrative – and, as Mandale points out, most hosting sites set aside space for bloggers to sell advertising – the city thinks you should cut it a check. According to Andrea Mannino of the Philadelphia Department of Revenue, in fact, simply choosing the option to make money from ads – regardless of how much or little money is actually generated – qualifies a blog as a business.
As the United States Federal government continues to lose touch with the American public, is there a potential Civil War ahead? George Hemminger (George4Title) says that the Obama administration has continued to polarize the public, Arizona is trying to defend its borders and as the patriot movement gains steam, it is likely a conflict will occur…
First Signs of Civil War begin in the US: Sheriff Tony DeMeo Threatens Force Against Federal Agents
‘We the people” are the familiar opening words of the Constitution of the United States — the framework for a self-governing people, free from the arbitrary edicts of rulers. It was the blueprint for America, and the success of America made that blueprint something that other nations sought to follow.
At the time when it was written, however, the Constitution was a radical departure from the autocratic governments of the 18th century. Since it was something so new and different, the reasons for the Constitution’s provisions were spelled out in the Federalist, a collection of essays written by three of the writers of the Constitution, as a sort of instruction guide to a new product.
The Constitution was not only a challenge to the despotic governments of its time, but has been a continuing challenge — to this day — to all those who think that ordinary people should be ruled by their betters, whether an elite of blood, or of books, or of whatever else gives people a puffed-up sense of importance.