Nation introduces a new Silver-based currency to avoid the fallout of the failing US Dollar.
Victoria, TX (PRWEB) June 23, 2010 — As the U.S. federal government increases its pressure on states and individuals working to reclaim rights guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, the response from the freedom movement varies across the U.S., from the subtle “Tenth Amendment” resolutions to the re-awakening of state militias
“Everything’s bigger in Texas,” says District 8 senator Robert Wilson, “especially our will to resist tyranny. Remember the Alamo? We won nationhood by international treaty in 1836 when we soundly defeated Mexico’s president Santa Anna and his armies at thebattle of San Jacinto. And since the U.S. Constitution doesn’t grant congress the authority to ‘annex’ another nation by a ‘resolution’, we stand on a solid lawful foundation to enjoy all the rights God granted us, like establishing our own separate economic system.”
1. The original United States that was in operation until 1860; a collection of sovereign Republics in the union. Under the original Constitution the States controlled the Federal Government; the Federal Government did not control the States and had very little authority.
2. The original United States has been usurped by a separate and different UNITED STATES formed in 1871, which only controls the District of Columbia and it’s territories, and which is actually a corporation (the UNITED STATES CORPORATION) that acts as our current government. The United States Corporation operates under Corporate/Commercial/Public Law rather than Common/Private Law.
The original Constitution was never removed; it has simply been dormant since 1871. It is still intact to this day. This fact was made clear by Supreme Court Justice Marshall Harlan (Downes v. Bidwell, 182, U.S. 244 1901) by giving the following dissenting opinion: “Two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and Independently of that Instrument.”
The Restore America Plan reclaimed the De Jure institutions of government of the 50 State Republics in order to restore Common Law that represents the voice of the people and ends Corporate Law that ignores the voice of the people while operating under Maritime/Admiralty/International Law. This occurred when warrants were delivered to all 50 Governors on March 30, 2010.
The rewritten Constitution of the UNITED STATES CORPORATION bypasses the original Constitution for the United States of America, which explains why our Congressmen and Senators don’t abide by it, and the President can write Executive Orders to do whatever he/she wants. They are following corporate laws that completely strip sovereigns of their God givenunalienable rights. Corporate/Commercial/Public Law is not sovereign (private), as it is an agreement between two or more parties under contract. Common Law (which sovereigns operate under) is not Commercial Law; it is personal and private.
The following candidates are dedicated to the success of: Operation Rescue The American Dream They need our full support through prayer, volunteers and financial donations. Share Operation Rescue the American Dream with as many people as possible to achieve the restoration of the U.S. Constitution, prosperity and our individual right to the pursuit of happiness!
Arizona
Thomas J. Zaleski – Candidate for AZ Congressional District 1
Areas of expertise: Economy & Finance www.zaleski4congress.com
United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1933 Vol. 33, page H-1303 THIS IS IMPORTANT!!!!
Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House:
“Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of Congress are
official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt
entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth
hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a
coroner’s report that will lead to our demise.
It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has
been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1,
Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and
insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 – Joint
Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause
dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official
capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and
Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal
Government exists today in name only.
The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International
Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International
Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now
operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers.
With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the
receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the
United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an
established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This
act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office
of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International
Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part:
“The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing
the United States.”
A little over a week ago, May 9th, President Obama gave a commencement address to the studentsgraduating from Hampton University decrying what he called “a 24/7 media environment that bombards us with all kinds of content and exposes us to all kinds of arguments” warning that because of this “information becomes a distraction, a diversion, a form of entertainment, rather than a tool of empowerment, rather than the means of emancipation. He further stated that because of all the information now available to Americans it “… is not only putting pressure on you; it’s putting pressure on our country and on our democracy.”
According to Obama’s logic, too much information is bad, puts too much pressure on people and government, should never be entertaining, and most of all should NEVER expose anyone to any other arguments/opinions/thoughts than those that are deemed trustworthy.
Trustworthy according to whom? Obama? The current American President who now holds the distinction of having held less press conferences than any other President in history? Who’s White House “message machinery” is reported to be an“enormous operation” employing over 350 and costing millions of dollars?
United States Congressional Record, March 17, 1993 Vol. 33, page H-1303 THIS IS IMPORTANT!!!!
Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House:
“Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11.. Members of Congress are
official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt
entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth
hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a
coroner’s report that will lead to our demise.
It is an established fact that theUnited States Federal Government has been dissolved by theEmergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and
insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 – Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.
The following is Tenth Amendment Center approved legislation to nullify federal overreach into the health care industry. Activists, we encourage you to send this to your state senators and representatives—and ask them to introduce this legislation in your state.
An Act to render null and void certain unconstitutional laws enacted by the Congress of the United States, taking control over thehealth insurance industry and mandating that individuals purchase health insurance under threat of penalty.
SECTION 1. The legislature of the State of ____________ finds that:
1. The People of the several states comprising the United States of America created the federal government to be their agent for certain enumerated purposes, and nothing more.
2. The Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution defines the total scope of federal power as being that which has been delegated by the people of the several states to the federal government, and all power not delegated to the federal government in the Constitution of the United States is reserved to the states respectively, or to the people themselves.
3. The assumption of power that the federal government has made by enacting the “Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act” interferes with the right of the People of the State of _____________ to regulate health care as they see fit, and makes a mockery of James Madison’s assurance in Federalist #45 that the “powers delegated” to the Federal Government are “few and defined”, while those of the States are “numerous and indefinite.”
COWS
Is it just me, or does anyone else find it amazing that during the mad cow epidemic our government could track a single cow, born in Canada almost three years ago, right to the stall where she slept in the state of Washington? And, they tracked her calves to their stalls. But they are unable to locate 11 million illegal aliens wandering around our country. Maybe we should give each of them a cow.
THE CONSTITUTION
They keep talking about drafting a Constitution for Iraq … Why don’t we just give them ours?
It was written by a lot of really smart guys, it has worked for over 200 years, and we’re not using it anymore.
THE 10 COMMANDMENTS
The real reason that we can’t have the Ten Commandments posted in a government building is this
–you cannot post ‘Thou Shalt Not Steal’ ‘Thou Shalt Not Commit Adultery’ and ‘Thou Shall Not Lie’
in a building full of politicians ….
it creates a hostile work environment.
Here’s the question asked in my September 2000 column titled “It’s Time To Part Company”: “If one group of people prefers governmentcontrol and management of people’s lives and another prefers liberty and a desire to be left alone, should they be required to fight, antagonize one another, risk bloodshed and loss of life in order to impose their preferences or should they be able to peaceably part company and go their separate ways?”
The problem that our nation faces is very much like a marriage where one partner has broken, and has no intention of keeping, the marital vows. Of course, the marriage can remain intact and one party tries to impose his will on the other and engage in the deviousness of one-upsmanship. Rather than submission by one party or domestic violence, a more peaceable alternative is separation.
I believe we are nearing a point where there are enough irreconcilable differences between those Americans who want to control other Americans and those Americans who want to be left alone that separation is the only peaceable alternative. Just as in a marriage, where vows are broken, our human rights protections guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution have been grossly violated by a government instituted to protect them. The Democrat-controlled Washington is simply an escalation of a process that has been in full stride for at least two decades. There is no evidence that Americans who are responsible for and support constitutional abrogation have any intention of mending their ways.
I am reposting this because of my own personal experience with the census bureau…
Firstly I would like to say that each and every one of my neighbors who came to census us were very polite [we knew most of them]…and were also very easy to talk to…
I had already decided that I didn’t want to answer anything except for how many people live here…Some people like my son would question “why”?… He loves to argue with me, lol.. being a fully fleged 20 yr old, and so is a good sounding board.
On this one he said…”Hey!…What if I want to know how many Mormans live in the United States?” or etc…blah blah blah… His point being…”Why didn’t I just answer the “damn” questions and be done with it!!…My answer was.. “Because I have the Constitutional right to decide whether I want to answer the questions or not….[see George Carlin's video on rights here[ George Carlin on America ] …it’s a Hoot!!… Seriously]…So watch the video so you kinda get the grasp of what are called “Rights” or “God given Rights”…
Being the oldest of five and raised by a lifer Lt.Cornel in the AF [dad was a pilot and Nam vet] and my mom who was the principal of a Catholic school…well you can see I was bred to question everything and test all boundries…Do I know that the government already has all this info about me?…OMG…If you are reading this and on the internet than you must know they do…and if you don’t well…better wise up but it’s too late…The point being I had the so called “right” to say no~
On to the census… I had not one, not two, but five people come down my driveway marked “Private” and come to my door to ask me questions…The first time, someone else answered the door, when I heard who it was I said…”Ohh, came on in and have a seat.”…They started on the spiel by saying do you live at such and such address to which I replied…well…the county hasn’t decided [which they haven't] we have one platt number and a different address….Then I just interrupted and said I will answer one question and one question only and that is how many people live in this house, that is my constitutional right….and BTW when someone asks that………. Since *when* did anyone have to have a constitution or even a “God” to give us rights…Aren’t we born with them?” …They did always said they understood my rights…well till the last guy…But anyway after the first one came a supervisor came to make sure that we were asked everything correctly and proceeded to re-ask every such and such question….or try anyway…I interrupted with the same answer… no problem…and again…till the last who said, “I totally understand, but DO YOU understand that it’s illegal to not answer these questions?…and gave me a piece of government paper..to which I duly noted and read that the government did in fact try to tell me that it WAS illegal to not “Duly Comply”…I said well I disagreed and he said, ”I understand, just had a fellow right over there [pointing] say the same thing…and he had been visited ELEVEN times.”…..Another person I know here was visited at his business NINE times [NOT a home]…and there you go…would you consider this harassment for so many DIFFERENT individuals to drive down a private drive, look around, come in your house [invited of course by me] and ask questions concerning income, phone number [hell no]…etc…? This is my rebuttal to the person who questioned this video…
~jude/rockingjude
This is an expose’ of the Census Bureau. This video itemizes the fundamental
legal questions that the Census Bureau refuses or fails to answer about its
collection and use of personal information from every American (see questions
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_a.png?x-id=a117c525-dc72-427d-8cc6-316cef1d3683)
